Navarino Project: Three-and-One-Half Months On

By Mark Pfost, Public Lands Ecologist – mpfost@wisducks.org

This article originally appeared in Wisconsin Waterfowl Association’s December, 2024 Newsletter edition.

You may recall that WWA finished its first public lands wetland restoration project with the DNR on Navarino Wildlife Area in late July. Spring and early summer this year were very wet. I worried that all the rain and subsequent high water levels would delay construction until late summer – if the rains ever quit and our site dried out. Rainfall dominated my conversations with the contractor as we approached the end of July, but he thought conditions would be okay and we agreed to get started.

On the day the contractor arrived on site, the ditch was full and flowing. Not only were we losing water, but constructing a solid ditch plug wasn’t feasible with a ditch full of water. He built a coffer dam west of the plug’s position to hold back water, and then pumped water out of the ditch for a day so that he could construct the plug without working in water.

While that work was going on, I went for a hike. My route paralleled the ditch on its south side, but well outside of the ditch corridor. A belt of trees, mostly buckthorn, and aspen, extended from the ditch bank to twenty yards or so away from it. I walked outside of this belt in restored tall-grass prairie. Even with all the recent rains, there was not standing water in my path — my boots stayed dry. Occasionally I noted a few sedges or a clump of wool grass — all wetland indicator species —  but not a drop of water. Two days later, construction was completed and I sowed about eighty pounds of winter rye over the newly constructed plug and other disturbed areas.

After surveying another DNR site in early November, I detoured to Navarino to see how the restoration was looking. Little rain fell across much of Wisconsin from July to November, water levels in ditches and wetlands I drove past were low. I didn’t know what to expect. The first thing to catch my eye was how little the winter rye had grown. It appeared healthy but stunted — an indication of lack of rain since it was planted?

The second was that water in the ditch above the plug and water in the scrape built to construct the plug were much closer together now than when I last saw the site.

I walked the same path through the prairie again, but this time I was frequently walking in 4-6 inches of water – out nearly forty yards from the ditch. I circled the west end of the ditch, its origination point, and saw a pool wider than the ditch. I circled through a small one-acre patch of trees on the north side of the ditch (while getting bloodied by prickly ash) and observed numerous, scattered spots where water was beginning to pool within the trees.

Before and after, the ditch and the ditch plug—from the same point

The restoration still has room to “grow,” perhaps adding as much as another eighteen inches of depth near the plug. This increased depth, will also spread laterally, saturating soils further into the prairie and further into the forested area.

Water in ditch above plug (left) may soon merge with scrape (right).

Assuming more rains and a melting snowpack next spring, I anticipate visitors will observe more above-surface water, and at greater distances from the ditch, than I saw on my November walk. Increased water levels will eventually kill many trees and shrubs, transforming the site into a more open wetland.

Water expanding into prairie (left). Looking from above the point of origin of ditch; it’s now several times wider than before (right).

All indications point to a successful restoration.

This innovative public lands program is the result of an agreement with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources with Pittman-Robertson Funding derived from your hunting and fishing expenditures.  Other funding necessary to support this program was contributed by the Fund For Lake MichiganThe James E. Dutton Foundation, and the Wisconsin Bird Fund, ” A Legacy Fund of the Society of the Tympanuchus Cupido Pinnatus.

Peter Helland Wildlife Area – Another Public Lands Project is Underway!

By Mark Pfost, Public Lands Ecologist – mpfost@wisducks.org

This article originally appeared in Wisconsin Waterfowl Association’s November, 2024 Newsletter edition.

At the end of October, WWA ecologists met with contractors at Peter Helland Wildlife Area. It was an opportunity for WWA to walk the proposed project area with contractors and to explain the project and answer contractors’ questions. This was the most recent step in WWA’s efforts to restore and enhance wetland habitat on approximately 125 acres.

As a recap, in April of last year, using various aerial imageries, I identified a complex of ditches on Peter Helland that was worthy of further investigation. I first walked the prospective area with a DNR employee; shortly afterward, he and WWA’s Project Director, Peter Ziegler, surveyed the site. Analyzation of that data revealed knowledge gaps that required more trips to gather additional elevation data. More analysis followed. That led to multiple iterative meetings, first internal to WWA, and then between WWA and the DNR; eventually everyone agreed on a restoration plan. With that accomplished, WWA submitted the wetland permit application and other requirements. The last of the permitting requirements were approved in August. With that done, we wrote a Scope of Work for the project and sent it to a number of contractors.

Now we’re in a waiting game. Interested contractors have until the middle of November to submit bids. We’ll notify the selected contractor by the end of November. After that? Work can’t start until gun-deer season ends. Then? It all comes down to suitable weather conditions and the contractor’s schedule.

This innovative public lands program is the result of an agreement with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources with Pittman-Robertson Funding derived from your hunting and fishing expenditures.  Other funding necessary to support this program was contributed by the Fund For Lake MichiganThe James E. Dutton Foundation, and the Wisconsin Bird Fund, ” A Legacy Fund of the Society of the Tympanuchus Cupido Pinnatus.

Little Yellow River Project – We’re Getting Closer!

By Mark Pfost, Public Lands Ecologist – mpfost@wisducks.org

This article originally appeared in Wisconsin Waterfowl Association’s November, 2024 Newsletter edition.

Peter Ziegler answers contractor question as Pfost and Darren Ladwig (DNR) look on.

In mid-October, we met contractors in the Visitors’ Center at the Necedah National Wildlife Refuge to further plan for this large-scale habitat project in the Little Yellow River Watershed Area. While most of the project work will be on Meadow Valley, the last of it will be on Refuge. Brad Strobel (USFWS wildlife biologist) and I led the scoping meeting in which we provided an overview of the area’s drainage history and more in depth project details.

Afterward, all WWA ecologists, DNR staff from Meadow Valley, and the contractors toured the project area. Sometimes this meant stopping at locations where the ditch could be seen from the road, and other times it meant hiking away from our vehicles to give contractors a better feel for variations in ditch characteristics and timber volumes. We had good conversations and contractors asked the questions they needed answers for as they write their bid proposals.

Pfost, Strobel, Zak Knab (DNR) and contractor discuss access to ditch plug locations.

Bids will have been received by the time you read this and WWA will notify bidders by the middle of November. Work cannot start until at least the end of gun-deer season. If it stays as dry as it has been the past few months, work could start shortly thereafter.

Wetland Restoration Begins in Little Yellow River Watershed

By Mark Pfost, Public Lands Ecologist – mpfost@wisducks.org

This article originally appeared in Wisconsin Waterfowl Association’s October, 2024 Newsletter edition.

Little Yellow River Watershed

WWA is set to take on its largest wetland restoration project ever! Wisconsin Waterfowl Association recently entered a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to restore wetland hydrology on thousands of acres of Juneau County public lands.

To understand this project, it is first necessary to understand what happened one-hundred years ago, early in the 20th Century. Following the logging “boom,” speculators and settlers saw the recently-cleared land as business opportunities. The dark peat soils looked fertile, but they were too wet to farm. So, the state’s first official drainage district formed and then designed a network of ditches which eventually drained sixty thousand acres of land. The Little Yellow River and Beaver Creek were deepened and straightened to help carry away water received from miles of ditches. Organic soils dried out and then burned up. In no time, the soils were depleted and farmers went broke. Some sold their farms and moved; others simply walked away. The “drainage dream” became a nightmare, and the county became responsible for abandoned lands, and local townships took responsibility for maintaining the roads.

In 1939, the federal government purchased about 110,000 acres of land from the county and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service set it aside for wildlife conservation. Forty-four thousand acres became the Necedah National Wildlife Refuge and the Wisconsin DNR agreed to manage the remainder as Meadow Valley State Wildlife Area. The agencies worked to improve wildlife habitat. They replanted forests, managed grasslands with prescribed fire, and constructed impoundments to manage water levels, but they did little to undo the damage of the drainage network.

Ever since, townships have struggled “in a game of inches” to maintain the low, sandy roads in the face of heavy precipitation events, undersized culverts and beaver dams. Roads flood frequently or wash out, and beavers plug culverts. The various government entities (federal, state, and local) viewed the problems and the solutions differently. Was it important to maintain all the roads?  Were the ditches helping or hurting the situation?  Was there a way to have wetlands and dry roads?

Little Yellow River Watershed, north of Hwy 173

Not long before Covid, Necedah’s wildlife biologist Brad Strobel began thinking about restoring the Little Yellow River. The river, a casualty of the drainage dream, had spent the last century as a turbid, moribund ditch with little to no wildlife value. At this time Strobel’s office was about ten feet from mine. We’d frequently use each other to chew over aspects of our respective restoration ideas; my private-lands projects or his on-Refuge projects. Discussions led to action, and in 2019 the Refuge began restoring the first mile of the Little Yellow River. Seeing large flocks of mallards working up and down the newly restored river told us that our ideas were working. Since then, the Refuge, with help from the DNR, restored four miles of the West Branch of the Little Yellow. [to see a story map of this work visit: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/fa9735d899af4ae0940e5c191ecc20be)

The new map of the Little Yellow River Watershed

Our conversations didn’t stop when I retired from USFWS, but they moved from offices to duck blinds or over an evening beer. When WWA and the DNR signed the agreement to restore wetlands on state owned/managed lands, my thoughts turned to the miles of ditches that were draining wetlands on Meadow Valley. Simultaneously, Strobel was thinking of the same ditches and how they increased the quantity of water flowing in the Little Yellow River, well beyond its historic channel capacity. The unpredictable timing and amplitude of high-flow events down these ditches also increased road-infrastructure costs for the townships, consuming money they didn’t have. Eventually, all parties began seeing wetland restoration as a potential solution to the problem. Strobel applied for grants, and I kept WWA informed on progress and possibilities. The project design is now completed, the permits are in hand, and we have the funds to proceed. We’ve begun the process to elicit bids for construction. Construction may be able to start this winter—weather and contractor availability can’t be foreseen.

The project has both conservation and community benefits. Rewetting thousands of acres of wetland upstream from the Little Yellow will increase waterfowl habitat and benefit many other wildlife species. These wetlands will also act as a sponge, soaking up heavy rain events, and as a filter through which water will flow. The wetlands will be better able to capture atmospheric carbon. Moderated flows will pass downstream more gently, causing less strain to transportation infrastructure. Fewer tax dollars will be spent to make the same road repairs over and over again.

Waterfowl hunters will have more productive wetlands to hunt, and given the project’s size, an opportunity to find quietude and solitude in an area recovering from the drainage dream.